Vijay Aggarwal Advocate showing up for previous Telecom Minister, A. Raja in the 2G Scam case recorded down the challenges of contending through Video Conferencing for a situation with an enormous number of documents under the watchful eye of the Delhi High Court.
A solitary appointed authority seat of Justice Brijesh Sethi while hearing the issue through video conferencing heard the contentions of the respondents. One of the requests was recorded by Conwood Construction and Developers (P) Ltd, an Accused in the 2G Prevention of Money Laundering case, looking for the arrival of the properties connected by the ED by outfitting a repayment security. Eminently, the CBI and ED had moved the Delhi High Court in March 2018 against the vindication of all charged in the 2G range case which became known in 2017. Vijay Aggarwal Lawyer presented that the application moved by CBI and ED is a 'counterblast' of the application moved by A. Raja for the arrival of property. Though, ASG Sanjay Jain showing up for the CBI presented that it is a simple fortuitous event and our application has been deferred as a result of the persevering circumstance in the midst of the COVID19 flare-up. On which Advocate Vijay Kumar Aggarwal fought that it's anything but an occurrence, it is a very much idea plan. Advocate Tarannum Cheema showing up for one of the respondents Mr. Sanjay Chandra presented that he is serving in Tihar Jail and had not been served a duplicate yet. Lawyer Vijay Kumar Aggarwal likewise presented that the scholarly ASG must explain on the 'public intrigue', how this application is moved by them is in the public intrigue. Advocate & Lawyer Vijay Aggarwal further included that 3 of my 4 customers are from Mumbai and 1 from Delhi, none of them can head out to both of the spots because of the overall circumstance, at that point by what method will take guidelines. We contend on the customer's guidelines. We don't have the benefit of being advised by CBI, that lone Mr. Jain has. Vijay Aggarwal further did a correlation of the prior excused application with the new application, in which everything is the equivalent. "I'm liable for awakening the resting monster, as I moved the application for arrival of property," Mr. Aggarwal included. After this Mr. Aggarwal looked for time from the court and mentioned for a knowing about the issue again tomorrow, he expressed that "I'll proceed with tomorrow." The seat permitted the equivalent and has guided the candidates to serve a duplicate to Mr. Chandra in prison at the most punctual. Reference - https://medium.com/@vijayaggarwaladvocate/advocate-vijay-aggarwal-questioned-hc-about-rajas-video-conferencing-f79e7df57f3a Comments are closed.
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
July 2023
Categories |