9/28/2020 Vijay Aggarwal Advocate Argued – Over 10K Pending Appeals In Delhi HC But CBI Focusing On 2G AppealRead Now Restricting the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) application for early hearing in the 2G request against vindication, Advocate Vijay Aggarwal speaking to financial specialist Shahid Balwa recently contended that in excess of 10,000 claims are as yet forthcoming of the individuals who are in prison under the steady gaze of Delhi High Court and there is no motivation behind why inclination ought to be given to the leave appeal documented by CBI which is against an exoneration which was conceded after every day preliminary.
Vijay Aggarwal Advocate likewise submitted, "Indian lawful framework doesn't cut to be hypothesis of dog the blamed at all expense by implies reasonable or foul". A solitary appointed authority seat of Justice Brijesh Sethi recently held the request on the supplication after all the gatherings closed their contentions. Lawyer Tarannum Cheema contended that her customer Sanjay Chandra is in legal care and was presented with the application today itself and requirements fourteen day's an ideal opportunity to record an answer to the leave appeal, notwithstanding, she contended that her customer Sanjay Chandra is in legal authority and is allowed just two video meetings for every week henceforth we won't have the option to take viable directions. Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General speaking to CBI and ED contended that significant public time has just been devoured. An adjudicator can generally choose how much time is needed to hear a matter...If veritable endeavours are made and help is delivered it's conceivable to take this issue to an obvious end result, ASG Jain included. All the respondents including previous Telecom Minister A Raja and others have firmly contradicted the use of the CBI and ED. Supporter Manu Sharma showing up for A Raja had recently contended that there was no reason to concede an amiss dire hearing to the bids moved by CBI and ED in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. The examination organization has just spoken about open enthusiasm for their application yet has not validated the equivalent with contentions, he said. Equity Brijesh Sethi, who is hearing the allure of ED and CBI against the preliminary court request which vindicated all the blamed in the 2G case, is resigning on 30th November this year. He had as of late gave notice to all respondents to record an answer on the early hearing supplication documented by the CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED). Ref - https://medium.com/@vijayaggarwaladvocate/vijay-aggarwal-advocate-argued-over-10k-pending-appeals-in-delhi-hc-but-cbi-focusing-on-2g-appeal-6d10ec4dfcbf Vijay Aggarwal Advocate showing up for previous Telecom Minister, A. Raja in the 2G Scam case recorded down the challenges of contending through Video Conferencing for a situation with an enormous number of documents under the watchful eye of the Delhi High Court.
A solitary appointed authority seat of Justice Brijesh Sethi while hearing the issue through video conferencing heard the contentions of the respondents. One of the requests was recorded by Conwood Construction and Developers (P) Ltd, an Accused in the 2G Prevention of Money Laundering case, looking for the arrival of the properties connected by the ED by outfitting a repayment security. Eminently, the CBI and ED had moved the Delhi High Court in March 2018 against the vindication of all charged in the 2G range case which became known in 2017. Vijay Aggarwal Lawyer presented that the application moved by CBI and ED is a 'counterblast' of the application moved by A. Raja for the arrival of property. Though, ASG Sanjay Jain showing up for the CBI presented that it is a simple fortuitous event and our application has been deferred as a result of the persevering circumstance in the midst of the COVID19 flare-up. On which Advocate Vijay Kumar Aggarwal fought that it's anything but an occurrence, it is a very much idea plan. Advocate Tarannum Cheema showing up for one of the respondents Mr. Sanjay Chandra presented that he is serving in Tihar Jail and had not been served a duplicate yet. Lawyer Vijay Kumar Aggarwal likewise presented that the scholarly ASG must explain on the 'public intrigue', how this application is moved by them is in the public intrigue. Advocate & Lawyer Vijay Aggarwal further included that 3 of my 4 customers are from Mumbai and 1 from Delhi, none of them can head out to both of the spots because of the overall circumstance, at that point by what method will take guidelines. We contend on the customer's guidelines. We don't have the benefit of being advised by CBI, that lone Mr. Jain has. Vijay Aggarwal further did a correlation of the prior excused application with the new application, in which everything is the equivalent. "I'm liable for awakening the resting monster, as I moved the application for arrival of property," Mr. Aggarwal included. After this Mr. Aggarwal looked for time from the court and mentioned for a knowing about the issue again tomorrow, he expressed that "I'll proceed with tomorrow." The seat permitted the equivalent and has guided the candidates to serve a duplicate to Mr. Chandra in prison at the most punctual. Reference - https://medium.com/@vijayaggarwaladvocate/advocate-vijay-aggarwal-questioned-hc-about-rajas-video-conferencing-f79e7df57f3a 9/23/2020 Ajnara Group Restrained From Creating Third Party Interest – Advocate Vijay Aggarwal CommentedRead Now The Delhi High Court has controlled Ajnara Group from making any further outsider premiums in its venture Times Square, after the charge of cheating RR Buildtech by selling the last's property to a bank.
A seat of Justice C Hari Shankar, in a between time request on Thursday, controlled Ajnara India and its auxiliary from making any further outsider interests in its undertaking Times Square and the land admeasuring 7,486 square meters in Noida on which the venture was to come up. Further, Ajnara India and its auxiliary were asked to clarify for what valid reason they ought not be coordinated to make sure about a measure of around Rs 50.51 crores that is as a matter of fact owed to RR Buildtown. Vijay Aggarwal Advocate, showing up for RR Buildtown, presented that Ajnara India had taken around Rs 34 crores from RR Buildtown to co-build up the land in Noida financially in the year 2015. The task called Times Square was to be a significant business center, however, regardless of taking cash from RR Buildtown, Ajnara India didn't begin any chip away at the undertaking. Advocate Vijay Aggarwal likewise called attention to that Ajnara India had sold the Times Squad land to Punjab National Bank Housing Finance for an advance of Rs 45 crores despite the fact that the market estimation of the land was around Rs 140 crores. Further, this advance was taken without the assent of RR Buildtown despite the fact that it possessed 45 percent value in the SPV with Ajnara India and had two chiefs on the SPV's board, the attorney said including that as such the bank couldn't give the advance itself. The supplication fought that Ajnara India and its auxiliary were each other's modify sense of self to such an extent that their enlisted addresses and email IDs were additionally the equivalent and this was a fit case for the lifting of the corporate cloak. "Besides, when the Rs 45 crores were dispensed by the Punjab National Bank Housing Finance, just Rs 10 crores was kept in the SPV which possessed the Times Square land and Rs 35 crores were given to Ajnara India for its own advantage," the request said. It said that taking into account Ajnara's problematic budgetary situation just as its default in compliance in all cases, they may even default on their credits taken from the bank and put the property of RR Buildtown itself in danger of abandonment. Reference - https://sites.google.com/view/vijayaggarwaladvocate/latest-news/vijay-aggarwal-advocate-news-3 9/15/2020 Accused Bail Plea Dismissed In firing at AAP MLA - Vijay Aggarwal Advocate Appeared Behalf Of ComplainantRead Now A session court of the Patiala House Court here excused the bail supplication of a blamed captured for supposedly terminating at AAP MLA Naresh Yadav's caravan in southwest Delhi which prompted a passing of a volunteer in February this year. Extra Sessions Judge Sanjay Khanagwal excused the bail supplication of Dharamvir false name Kalu thinking about the realities and conditions, the gravity of the offense, and the function of charged. "For this situation, the offense affirmed against the blamed is not kidding in nature; his quality alongside the principle aggressor is reflected in the announcement of the observers under Section 161 of CrPC. Besides, recuperation of weapon of offense is expressed to have been influenced in compatibility of his divulge articulation of the candidate," the court said. "Up until this point, as the ground of equality with the bail allowed to the co-denounced is concerned, the equivalent isn't accessible to the charged thinking about his job and recuperation. The grumbling of a danger given by the harmed Harender Mann to the SHO PS Kishangarh, New Delhi can't be overlooked at this stage, in spite of the fact that the equivalent is the topic of examination by the SHO," the court included. Advocate Pradeep Rana, showing up for the denounced Dharamvir looked for abandon the ground of equality with his co-blamed sibling Somraj moniker Dhami and on the ground that there were errors in the FIR. Though showing up for the complainant, advocate Vijay Aggarwal, Jagdeep Sharma and Barkha Rastogi, intensely restricted the bail application, calling attention to that the bail allowed to the co-charged was under test under the watchful eye of the High Court of Delhi. Vijay Aggarwal Advocate called attention to different bogus deceiving pleadings and coverings in the bail use of the charged. It was brought up that the Accused had not moved toward the Court with clean hands, as the bail application was asserted to be "First bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Code of Procedure (CrPC)," though the equivalent was his Second Bail Application. Further, in the bail application, the candidate/denounced was appeared to have clean forerunners; nonetheless, Lawyer Vijay Aggarwal carried it to the information on the Court that there was another FIR enlisted in 2015 against him and his co-charged siblings, wherein the case is going on in Patiala House Court. It was additionally brought up that the charged is known as the "muscleman of the region" which in certainty was likewise referenced by the Investigating Officer in his answer to the bail application, Vijay Aggarwal Lawyer contended. A guard of the AAP party was in progress in Mehrauli, which was getting back from a sanctuary following a success of an AAP MLA in the gathering political race. Around then, charged people had purportedly shot the perished Ashok Maan, a 45-year-old Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) volunteer, in which assault the expired's relative Harender was likewise harmed. A FIR was enrolled under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and different segments in Kishangarh in February this year. Reference - https://sites.google.com/view/vijayaggarwaladvocate/latest-news/vijay-aggarwal-advocate-news-1 ABOUT Vijay Aggarwal Metropolitan Law Firm Metropolitan Law Firm is a complete law firm with the office in Delhi. The lawyers in the firm are highly-qualified and master in their practice area. The metropolitan law associate has handled several projects and also advises on legal issues. Started with a vision to provide efficient solutions on legal issues, the firm is recognized for its best law services. Requirement Metropolitan Law Firm: Selected intern's day-to-day responsibilities include: 1. Drafting agreements, MOUs, deeds etc. 2. Making PPTs on legal topics 3. Reviewing/vetting of agreements 4. Liasoning with departments 5. Making case summary and legal notices 6. Replying to legal queries Important: This posting is for corporate practice and the candidate shall not be assigned litigation work. Who can apply for Internship for Vijay Aggarwal Metropolitan Law Associates: Only those students or freshers can apply who: are available for full time (in-office) internship have relevant skills and interests can start the internship as early as possible are available for duration of 30 days have already graduated or are currently in any year of study Females willing to start/restart their career may also apply Number of internships/jobs available: 1 Categories: Law |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
July 2023
Categories |